<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: prediction-o-rama, finance style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rethinkingmarkets.org/2009/02/11/prediction-o-rama-finance-styel.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rethinkingmarkets.org/2009/02/11/prediction-o-rama-finance-styel.html</link>
	<description>Economic Sociology from the Ground Up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingmarkets.org/2009/02/11/prediction-o-rama-finance-styel.html#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingmarkets.org/?p=528#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Not exactly - the alternative future where I am wrong (and where it looks more like 1998) is where prices bounce back after wacky, panic-like activity. So that many of, say, LTCM&#039;s positions actually weren&#039;t as crappy as they were when they were forced to come to terms with them.

I don&#039;t know what it means that the &lt;em&gt;good scenario&lt;/em&gt; is 1998. The bad scenario that I would suggest is more likely is that banks try to get cute and re-bury their trash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly &#8211; the alternative future where I am wrong (and where it looks more like 1998) is where prices bounce back after wacky, panic-like activity. So that many of, say, LTCM&#8217;s positions actually weren&#8217;t as crappy as they were when they were forced to come to terms with them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what it means that the <em>good scenario</em> is 1998. The bad scenario that I would suggest is more likely is that banks try to get cute and re-bury their trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn Lena</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingmarkets.org/2009/02/11/prediction-o-rama-finance-styel.html#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingmarkets.org/?p=528#comment-245</guid>
		<description>So this is what it would have felt like in 1998, if I had understood what was going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is what it would have felt like in 1998, if I had understood what was going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

